Gidday,
I fished today in around 85m with the following settings on the P66:
Range 30m
Shift 75m
Range question: Why are we encouraged to set range first when shift seems to determine the starting depth? If we already know the depth we want to monitor, doesn't it make more sense to set a shift first and then adjust the range?
Accufish question #1: You'll note a few probable fish sizes on the screen shot. Why aren't these 'fish' showing up as properly defined blobs or arches rather than being confused in a big mass of bait and in which part of the circle are the 'fish'' registering?
Accufish question #2: See the doubled up 67cm fish, would that be a pair with one fish slightly higher in the water column than its partner?
I fished today in around 85m with the following settings on the P66:
Range 30m
Shift 75m
Range question: Why are we encouraged to set range first when shift seems to determine the starting depth? If we already know the depth we want to monitor, doesn't it make more sense to set a shift first and then adjust the range?
Accufish question #1: You'll note a few probable fish sizes on the screen shot. Why aren't these 'fish' showing up as properly defined blobs or arches rather than being confused in a big mass of bait and in which part of the circle are the 'fish'' registering?
Accufish question #2: See the doubled up 67cm fish, would that be a pair with one fish slightly higher in the water column than its partner?