Dff3d vs wassp

[jp498]

Good morning gentlemen,

I use DFF3D and I have known limitations of mapping at depths greater than 200m.

As I am very interested in fishing between 250m and 600m, I ask if it is possible to make 3D maps or record bathymetry with DI-FFAMP and R509-LH transducer with 2xTZT3-12F (SXC20) at these depths?

I also ask if it is possible to use WASSP simultaneously for depths greater than 200m.

Thanks

For single beam recording and Wassp recording, you'll be using a computer and not the TZT3. (though the TZT3 will interface nicely with the computer)

 

[WalneyDalBosco]

Thanks for the answers,

So it is not possible to generate PGB bathymetry with the DI-FFAMP connected with an R509-LH transducer on the NAVNET TZT3 12' equipped with the SXC20 satellite compass?

 

[Deep Blue]

WalneyDalBosco,

Are you planning to record this PBG with TimeZero..?

- Deep Blue :think

 

[WalneyDalBosco]

yes, i'm very interested. Do you have any additional suggestions on this?

 

[Magnetron]

Thanks for the answers,

So it is not possible to generate PGB bathymetry with the DI-FFAMP connected with an R509-LH transducer on the NAVNET TZT3 12' equipped with the SXC20 satellite compass?

If you used the hardness feature from a standalone FCV1150 paired with the R509LH, by setting up the FCV sounder to think it had the right specific Furuno XDR's for hardness, it could output something over NMEA to a PC with Timezero Pro that looked like PBG. However, the results probably wouldn't match anything remotely compared to the PBG product the DFF3D Multibeam paired with the TZT3 makes.

Hope this helps, :sail

- Maggy