Aggeloseco
Furuno Fan
Hello to everyone.
I am using currently the DFF1-UHD / TM265LH with the Maxsea professional software with the Sounder and PBG module. My main task is to record the Bottom Hardness as a cartography to my regions of Interest. Until now I had experience only over the FCV 588 with the p66 transducer.
The problem is that I get different Bottom Compositions from the 2 setups. I was recording yesterday in an area of depth between 70-100 meters, and I was getting in my TZ Professional with DFF1UHD/TM265LH setup too much sand as well as mud, and from curiosity, I switched the FCV588 with p66 on, which it was showing Gravel as well as sand with small percentage of Rocks. The TZ Pro, on the other hand, was demonstrating alternatively sand with mud and only in some small fraction of time small amount Gravel or Rock.
Does anyone know why is that happening, and which of 2 setups are more reliable?
The photos below are from the same spot.
I am using currently the DFF1-UHD / TM265LH with the Maxsea professional software with the Sounder and PBG module. My main task is to record the Bottom Hardness as a cartography to my regions of Interest. Until now I had experience only over the FCV 588 with the p66 transducer.
The problem is that I get different Bottom Compositions from the 2 setups. I was recording yesterday in an area of depth between 70-100 meters, and I was getting in my TZ Professional with DFF1UHD/TM265LH setup too much sand as well as mud, and from curiosity, I switched the FCV588 with p66 on, which it was showing Gravel as well as sand with small percentage of Rocks. The TZ Pro, on the other hand, was demonstrating alternatively sand with mud and only in some small fraction of time small amount Gravel or Rock.
Does anyone know why is that happening, and which of 2 setups are more reliable?
The photos below are from the same spot.